My author copies of the paperback edition of the Handbook of Internet Politics have arrived
Routledge did an excellent job of getting this out quickly. The UK version is available now. The US version is available mid-February.
Online Interpersonal Communication, Accidental Exposure and By-Product Political Learning During the British General Election of 2010: A Study of Twitter.
My colleague, Dr Oliver Heath, and I have today submitted a proposal to the “full application” round of the Leverhulme Trust’s Research Projects Grant competition (the deadline is December 1; the “outline application” was submitted in June 2009). A brief synopsis is below. If you’re working in the area of Twitter and politics, or are considering a project in this area and would like more information regarding our theoretical framework, research questions, and hypotheses, contact me by email: andrew.chadwick@rhul.ac.uk.
Online Interpersonal Communication, Accidental Exposure and By-Product Political Learning During the British General Election of 2010: A Study of Twitter
We know very little about how the internet now shapes political behaviour in Britain. Most of what we do know comes from valuable empirical political science funded during the early 2000s. But since then, citizens’ online political habits and the nature of the internet have both changed dramatically, with the now well-established shift toward greater interactivity and interpersonal communication through online social network sites and web 2.0 services. This project will empirically explore the contemporary internet’s effects on political engagement by focusing on interpersonal communication, accidental exposure, and by-product political learning. To do so, it will examine parliamentary candidates’ and the public’s behaviour on Twitter—the most intriguing, controversial, and fastest growing online social network service in the UK to date—during the general election of 2010. The project will explore the general role and function of Twitter in British political communication, but most importantly it will assess the extent to which the serendipitous nature of web 2.0 online environments increases levels of accidental exposure to political information. It will identify the extent to which interpersonal communication creates accidental exposure that may or may not lead to by-product political learning and political engagement, including voting.
Studying political communication in a diffuse interpersonal environment like Twitter has many advantages, but it also presents significant methodological challenges. We seek to overcome these through a research design incorporating a novel, nonintrusive, natural experiment. Multivariate statistical analyses, including multiple regression (with lagged variables), simultaneous latent class analysis and structural equation modelling, will be used to test hypotheses about direct exposure and accidental exposure to candidates’ messages and by-product learning about politics, relative entertainment preference, political interest, political efficacy, and political engagement (including voting), and other salient variables.
UPDATE: Alas, the project was not funded. And that, as they say, is that.
Edited by me, featuring an excellent collection of papers. Click on the link for the full billing.
“The Change We Need” - context
The Change We Need has rightly sparked off a huge debate, and it’s an important one, not only for Labour, but for all British political parties.
Part of the analytical context here can be found in this article that Nick Anstead and I published in the summer of 2008:
Anstead, N. and Chadwick, A. (2008) ‘Parties, Election Campaigning and the Internet: Toward A Comparative Institutional Approach’ in Chadwick, A. and Howard, P. N. (eds) The Handbook of Internet Politics (Routledge), pp. 56-71. Download pdf.
More information on the Handbook of Internet Politics here.
